Filed under News, Real Estate by Lois Buckett on April 30, 2012 at 3:42 pm
no comments

Australia’s housing sector has called on the reserve bank to deliver a 50 basis point interest rate cut after a survey showed new home sales have fallen to their lowest level in more than a decade.
The Housing Industry Association (HIA), which represents the residential building industry, says new home sales dropped 9.4 per cent, seasonally adjusted, in March 2012, their lowest level in more than 10 years.
Multi-unit sales slumped 6.4 per cent over the same period.
HIA chief economist Harley Dale called on the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to deliver a 50 basis point interest rate cut at its board meeting on Tuesday.
An AAP survey of 16 economists on Friday showed all expected the RBA to cut the cash rate 25 basis points, to 4.00 per cent, this week.
However, Mr Dale said a larger cut was needed to revive the housing sector.
"The bank needs to send a clear signal that it is back on the case of assisting an economy that is clearly weaker than it anticipated in 2012," said Harley Dale.
"It is not too late to turn the situation around and prevent new housing from revisiting a GFC (global financial crisis) low.
"Interest rate cuts, while no panacea, can provide substantial assistance in restoring confidence and activity."
The survey of Australia’s 100 largest builders found Queensland suffered the biggest decline with new home sales down 15.3 per cent, followed by Western Australia, down 12 per cent, and New South Wales, down 9.7 per cent.
Story source: http://finance.ninemsn.com.au
Filed under News by Lois Buckett on March 31, 2012 at 9:30 am
no comments

This week, thousands of cities across the globe will dim their lights at 8.30pm for an hour, joining in the world’s largest voluntary environmental action: Earth Hour.
Scheduled for the last Saturday of every March – closely coinciding with the equinox to ensure that most cities are in darkness as it rolls out around the Earth.
The growing importance of this global environmental action is reinforced by the unprecedented challenges our planet faces.
Our growing population is consuming at a rate that requires much more than one planet can provide. We are not living sustainably. While our carbon footprint grows, biodiversity is shrinking while our hunger for natural resources expands. Living beyond our planet’s means is putting increased pressure on food security, water security and climate security.
Earth Hour’s growth from 2 million people in Sydney, the city in which it all started, in 2007, to hundreds of millions in more than 5000 cities across more than 130 countries and territories shows that individuals across the globe recognise the challenges our planet is facing.
This year Earth Hour organisers hope to see this initiative grow further, with new countries taking part and landmarks from Las Vegas, Times Square, the Brandenburg Gate and the Eiffel Tower to the Burj Khalifa and even the International Space Station committing to switch off for the planet.
But the real value of Earth Hour does not lie in its sheer scale. The real value is in individual, grassroots actions. When you consider the potential of hundreds of millions of people all making small changes, it gives us hope for the future of our planet.
Earth Hour is about much more than an hour of darkness, it is about people showing their commitment to sustainability and environmental action. It is about individuals moving beyond NGOs, governments and businesses to express their personal commitment to living more sustainably.
So just remember – do your bit this week for the planet and switch off. For further information have a look at www.earthhour.org
Source: www.smh.com.au
Source: www.yonderr.com.au
Filed under News, Research by Lois Buckett on March 30, 2012 at 4:11 pm
no comments

Next time you’re cooking up a storm in your kitchen spare a thought for the passengers on board an A330 Qantas flight from Sydney to Adelaide on Friday, 13 April.
This auspicious flight will be powered by recycled cooking oil from commercial kitchens that is mixed with jet fuel that emits 60% less carbon dioxide.
The recycled cooking oil comes from restaurants in the US and is further refined and fully certified for use in commercial aviation and endorsed by the World Wildlife Fund.
Virgin Australia is moving ahead with plans to source and refine aviation fuel from WA mallee trees.
European plane maker Airbus is joining this effort, which also involves US giant General Electric and Australia’s Future Farm Industries CRC.
The project aims to have an alternative fuel production pilot plant operating in Australia within the next year.
Qantas’ head of environment, John Valastro, said the goal of next month’s biofuel flights was to raise awareness about the potential for sustainable fuel in Australia.
“We know that sustainable aviation fuel can be used in commercial aviation just like conventional jet fuel,” Mr Valastro said.
“But until it is produced at a commercial scale, at a competitive price, the industry will not be able to realise its true benefits.
“No single player can make this happen. It needs support from government, private sector investment, access to infrastructure and market demand.”
Biofuels for aviation are significantly different to those for other industries because of a jet engine’s need for high-energy yield.
Biofuels will eventually enable the aviation industry to reduce its carbon footprint because the biofuel feed stocks – which could include algae and the crop camelina – will absorb as much carbon dioxide when growing as they emit when burnt in a jet engine.
Typically, aviation biofuels, unlike many other biofuels, are from feed stocks such as algae or from plants such as jatropha that have no impact on food crops.
Just remember there are lots of things you can do at home to reduce your carbon footprint. Try to reduce your waste, reuse items whenever you can, recycle paper, cardboard, bottles and so on, and to take things a step further try carbon offsetting at www.yonderr.com.au
Source: thewest.com.au
Filed under Finance, News by Lois Buckett on March 27, 2012 at 1:54 pm
no comments
The Australian Government has chosen to simultaneously introduce three significant tax changes that directly affect the Australian Construction Industry. See what those big tax changes are and how they will affect you.
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics the construction industry is the fourth largest contributor to Australia’s GDP accounting for around 7% of Australia’s total economy and over 9% of Australia’s employment. Construction has been a backbone of the Australian economy and the Australian way of life. Notwithstanding, the Australian government has chosen to simultaneously introduce three very significant tax changes that directly affect the Australian construction industry.
As of July 1, 2012, the construction industry will be hit with the implications of:
- Carbon Tax
- Mining Tax
- Compulsory reporting of subcontracting arrangements
This is a time when the government has already withdrawn support from those in the building and construction industry through:
Eliminating the free home insulation scheme.
Not continuing or increasing the School Building and Renovations program.
Being extremely inconsistent on when and if they are going to subsidise solar.
Taking longer than expected to roll out the National Broadband Network (a major infrastructure project consuming huge construction industry resources)
It has also come at a time when the Federal and State Governments are applying increasing requirements for builders to build green home and green renovations such as Victoria’s recent upgrade to a minimum 6 star rating for new homes at the same time that consumers are trying to build bigger homes with smaller budgets.
The Carbon Tax and the Construction Industry
Service Central has already published a review of how the Carbon Tax will affect the Construction Industry here, however let’s go over the key points once again.
Manufacturing the materials used in construction of new homes and renovations is extremely carbon intensive. As a result the carbon tax will add thousands of dollars of new costs to a new home. The HIA estimates that with the introduction of carbon tax the price of a new home will increase by between 0.8% and 1.7%.The Allen Consulting Group have released a carbon price mechanism report that estimates that the carbon tax will add around $3,821 to its model two storey detached brick veneer 200m2 house.
The Allen Consulting Group report found that in building a two storey home in NSW you would see increases in a broad variety of building costs, including:
- Direct Energy: 6.8%
- Aluminium: 4.1%
- Bricks: 4%
- Concrete: 3.2%
- Steel: 3%
- Carpet: 2.6%
- Paint: 1.5%
- Timber: 1.5%
- Glass: 1.1%
- Plasterboard: 1%
The Mining Tax and the Construction Industry
Whilst the Mining Tax is not directly related to the Construction Industry, the Government’s Mining Tax will increase the costs to an industry that supplies materials to Australia’s Construction Industry.
The mining tax that is set to commence from July 1 2012, imposes on select sectors of the Australia’s Mining Industry a 30% tax on extraordinary profits, specifically in the coal and iron ore sectors.
Similar to the Carbon Tax, this Mining Tax could have a flow-on effect to the Construction Industry that causes price increases in building materials and construction costs. An increased cost of production in the coal industry could lead to even further increases in the cost of Direct Energy as a significant proportion of Australia’s electricity is produced using coal. Building products that use a lot of energy in their production such as aluminium, steel and glass could be hit hard.
Targeting the iron ore sector also could have a direct flow-on to the cost of steel, a major component in the manufacture of Australian homes.
Tax Office targets Construction Industry in Sub-Contractor Crackdown
The third prong in the Government’s three-prong attack on Australia’s Construction industry is a significant crack-down on payments to subcontractors by builders with the introduction of mandatory reporting to the ATO of all payments made to subcontractors.
The new tax regime starts on July 1, 2012, and requires builders to report to the tax office all of the following:
The details of sub-contractors used by the builder.
The ABN of each subcontractor.
The exact amounts paid to each subcontractor.
It is proposed that the ATO will be using this information to data-match against the tax returns of each subcontractor. It is possible that discrepancies in the amounts reported by the builder and the subcontractors could lead to further scrutiny of their accounts by the Australian Tax Office.
The ATO has also indicated that it may share this information with various State and Territory authorities that could, for example match with payroll tax and workers compensation payment records. Should this information also find its way into the hands of construction industry run superannuation and insurance schemes, significant additional costs could be imposed on small businesses.
Accountants have said that this extra reporting requirement will cost builders on average of $300-$500 per year extra in compliance costs. There are also risks that builders will be hit with extra costs as a result of increased audits from the ATO of their businesses and the businesses of their subcontractors. Furthermore, subcontractors may seek to increase their rates to builders as a result of the extra risk of the builders reporting their payments directly to the tax office.
The guidance from the ATO as to what needs to be reported and what doesn’t has been confusing to say the least. For example, the ATO has said that domestic building projects will be exempt from the program, however if the domestic building projects involve the use of subcontractors then they will need to be reported. Given that nearly every building project (of any size) involves the collaboration between various contractors (plumbers, electricians, painters, tilers, etc) it would seem that this “exclusion” actually might still capture the vast majority of projects.
This change comes into operation on July 1, 2012, so we would highly recommend that everyone in the building industry (builders as well as subcontractors) speak to their accountant about how this is going to affect them. If you’re accountant is not experienced in these matters then it is important that you post a job request for an accountant and get some quality advice for your business.
Resources:
Carbon Tax
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1350.0Feature+Article1Oct+2010
http://hia.com.au/media/Industry-policy/~/media/Files/documents/Carbon%20Tax%20documents/carbon_tax_price_adjustment.ashx
http://www.allenconsult.com.au/resources/acgcarbonprice2011.pdf
Subcontracting
http://www.smartcompany.com.au/construction-and-engineering/048605-the-building-industry-gets-ready-for-changes-to-tax-reporting.html
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics the construction industry is the fourth largest contributor to Australia’s GDP accounting for around 7% of Australia’s total economy and over 9% of Australia’s employment. Construction has been a backbone of the Australian economy and the Australian way of life. Notwithstanding, the Australian government has chosen to simultaneously introduce three very significant tax changes that directly affect the Australian construction industry.
Story source: http://www.servicecentral.com.au
Filed under Finance, Lennox Head by Lois Buckett on March 26, 2012 at 10:03 am
no comments
Knowing your limits and the market will help to expand your property portfolio.
Why do some people struggle to buy one investment property and yet others manage to own five or six? The answer isn’t simply that they have more money.
Investors who are creative in their approach to financing and who thoroughly research the important real estate indicators routinely achieve their goals faster and with less hassle.
There are several well-known ways to increase a property portfolio. You can take out an interest-only loan, buy with partners as ”tenants in common” or tap into your home equity.

Owning an investment property is not out of reach, it simply requires an astute approach. Photo: AFR
All of which help free up cash flow, enabling you to make more substantial contributions to a principal place of residence or to access cash flow for other investments. Coupled with buying investment properties in the right place at the right time, these tactics have reaped financial rewards for many people.
But savvy investors take their strategies to the next level. Let’s look at some of the less-traditional approaches to more profitable property investing.
Varying your income tax
If you’re negatively geared, a good way to improve immediate cash flow is to ask your accountant to submit an income tax variation form to your payroll office.
This reduces the tax rate charged on your wages by estimating your total end-of-financial-year tax position in advance. Rather than receiving a lump sum tax refund, you receive money evenly throughout the year.
Line of credit with a global limit
This is a line of credit home loan with a ”global” or ”umbrella” limit and several sub-accounts. It gives you maximum access to your equity to optimise your investment opportunities. The loan can be operated with multiple accounts under one global limit.
Mortgage Choice spokeswoman Belinda Williamson says line of credit accounts can be attached to a credit card. ”If you earn a decent income, using a credit card for expenses should mean that most of your income stays in the loan until the credit card payment is due, which helps to reduce the loan balance.”
Targeting distressed vendors
Successful investors don’t appraise the properties on the market in an area, they try to work out why they are for sale. Paul Osborne, of the buyer’s advocate firm Secret Agent, says it’s a smart move to understand household indebtedness in specific areas to snare a bargain.
He says many households are managing to service only the interest repayments, not the principal amount, of their home loans. As a consequence, the best buying opportunities tend to be in suburbs that have high proportions of household debt.
A secondary dwelling as an investment
Building second dwellings, such as granny flats, on the land held by either an owner-occupied or an investment property has become a growing trend. These dwellings can generate extra rental income and increase the property’s future value.
They also provide depreciation benefits and must be council-approved. Lending criteria for secondary dwellings varies from lender to lender and it’s smart to monitor how such additions in an area have shifted property values.
Choose a loan tailored to your needs
Depending on your finances, lifestyle and investment portfolio, there are a range of property loans to consider. Ms Williamson recommends checking the health of your home loan at least once a year.
”You should make sure that your loans not only meet your current needs but also take your future needs into consideration,” she says. ”Make sure that you are managing your loan, rather than letting it manage you.” Always be aware that new products are entering the competitive housing finance market constantly.
Story source: www.domain.com.au Story by Chris Tolhurst
Filed under News, Real Estate by Lois Buckett on March 13, 2012 at 12:28 pm
no comments
There are times that cause you to take a reality check on Australia’s overriding view of bricks and mortar as investments.
As brown swirling flood waters force thousands of people from their homes in NSW and northern Victoria last week, the images of rivers breaking their banks and gushing through gardens and into homes are enough to make you cry.
When one devastated homeowner declared on national television that he "wasn’t going through this again", his pain was raw for all to see.
Imagine being forced to grab a few precious belongings and leave your home to the will of nature.
Yes, it’s only brick and mortar, and not lives, but for many people – if not almost everyone – a home is part of what defines you. It’s full of memories. And most poignantly, brimming with dreams of times ahead.
A spokeswoman for the Bureau of Meteorology says the recent high rainfall is a result of La Niña and is not necessarily related to longer-term climate change.
Nevertheless, given that this week’s widespread flooding follows last year’s wave of floods, cyclones and bushfires, the question facing many Australians is whether this is situation normal, and if so, do we need to adapt our style of housing, or the infrastructure around it?
In a speech given by Insurance Australia Group chief executive Mike Wilkins late last year, he called on governments to learn the lessons from our recent experience to make our communities safer.
"If we don’t take action, we’re doomed to repeat this cycle of destruction, devastation, slow rebuild and lost productivity over and over again into the future," Wilkins told the American Chamber of Commerce in December.
"In recent times we’ve seen significant new areas of land being opened up for development in the rapidly growing areas around the north west of Sydney. Much of this region is located on the Nepean floodplain and has historically been subject to severe flooding.
"We believe the planning authorities responsible for releasing these areas of land must ensure mitigation work is conducted prior to any new building, so it is not subject to flood if the outskirts of Sydney experience a wet summer similar to Queensland’s."
Wilkins also highlighted the tragic Queensland floods of last summer.
"[They] were not the first times that many of the areas around Brisbane, Ipswich, Toowoomba and Emerald had been severely flooded. It will also not be the last time. In these areas, it is not a question of if; it’s a question of when the next flood will come.
"Notwithstanding this inevitable pattern, plenty of development – homes, sheds, businesses, even infrastructure like substations – was allowed to spring up in areas of unacceptable risk around Brisbane and Ipswich over the intervening drier years."
Wilkins said it was irresponsible to rebuild in a way that "ignores clear historical records". "We do a great disservice and potential harm to our community if we grow apathetic in our approach to rebuilding," he said.
Wilkins put forward a number of solutions, which are listed verbatim below:
- Increasing the woefully inadequate level of investment in mitigation infrastructure. Protective works could include barrages for unusual tides, levee banks, sea walls, properly maintained fire breaks and access trails, improved drainage and dams.
- Planning authorities must be a lot tougher and more transparent about their planning and zoning decisions. Development simply shouldn’t be allowed in areas of unacceptable danger.
- Strengthened building standards will ensure we are adequately prepared for changing risks.
"The improvement to building codes in cyclone-prone areas in north Queensland following Tropical Cyclone Larry meant that – notwithstanding its enormous size and destructive wind speeds – the level of damage incurred during Tropical Cyclone Yasi … was surprisingly low," Wilkins argued.
Story source: www.domain.com.au
Filed under News, Real Estate by Lois Buckett on February 13, 2012 at 10:31 am
no comments
There’s still money to be made out of property if you are careful and hard-headed.
It has been the wealth strategy of a generation. Buy a home. Look after it, improve it, upgrade it. And if cash flow allows, gear up to your eyeballs to buy more property for other people to live in. For the baby boomers and for many from generations X and Y, it has been an easy path to success.
But the prospect of lower rates of capital growth and possibly even falls, if the doomsayers are right and the global economy takes another big turn for the worse, has changed the outlook for property investment.
Home owners and investors will need to be smarter about property. Solid rental yields, buying the right property at the right price and less dependence on gearing will be the key to making money. The days of certain returns made by gearing up and hitching a ride on the market boom are gone. At least for now.
THE OUTLOOK FOR PROPERTY
In November, The Economist magazine said Australian housing prices were still 38 per cent overvalued when compared with incomes and a hefty 53 per cent when compared with rents. Household debt levels in Australia exceeded those in the US at the peak of the boom, which makes us highly vulnerable to falling prices if the worst case of a second crisis – worse than that of 2008-09 – happens.
In December, ratings agency Moody’s said Australian house prices were unsustainable and last month a leading US real estate analyst, Jordan Wirsz, predicted Australian house prices could fall by as much as 60 per cent.
Last week, the Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey found Australia was one of the least affordable countries in which to buy a home. The median house price in capital cities was 6.7 times the median annual household income – with only Hong Kong being more expensive. Sydney was the least affordable city in Australia, with a median house price 9.2 times the average annual household income.
Many commentators say prices might be fully valued, or overvalued, but a crash is not the only way the market can correct itself. The head of property and financial system research at ANZ, Paul Braddick, says talk of a big crash assumes a doomsday scenario for the economy. While not impossible, he says it’s unlikely.
”Our base case is that the labour market will remain soft for the next six months but will start to pick up again in 2012-13,” he says. ”It won’t be a boom in any sense but [the economy] should bottom and start to pick up again.
”But there are risks and that does overlay sentiment. There’s a fear of the unknown and if Europe does implode, how will that affect us? As we saw in 2008 at the height of the global financial crisis, if overseas conditions get worrying enough, the Reserve Bank will react. In 2008-09, it lowered interest rates and boosted the housing market, though that was also helped by the new first-home owner boost and changes to the foreign investment rules, which are less likely to reappear this time.”
Given that, Braddick says the most likely scenario is that house prices will fall further in the next six to 12 months but once they have found a floor, prices should start to rise in line with household incomes. He says that means longer-term growth of about 4 per cent to 5 per cent a year on average, though there will be cycles around that.
The chief economist at AMP Capital Investors, Dr Shane Oliver, says historically, prices get ”stuck in a range” for five to 10 years after they have been pushed to extremes. He says research on house prices since 1920 shows they have risen about 3 per cent a year after inflation in the longer term.
He says in the 1990s, prices were below that long-term trend (see graph below) but they took off in the early 2000s and are now about 25 per cent above the trend line. Though not predicting a US-style collapse, Oliver says it is hard to see prices growing at the rate they were because affordability is so poor and people are more reluctant to take on debt.
Australian Property Monitors (APM) is predicting national growth this year of 3 per cent to 5 per cent (see table above).
It says Brisbane, Perth and Darwin have the potential for higher growth while Melbourne, Adelaide and Hobart are likely to underperform.
POTENTIAL STUMBLING BLOCKS
The managing director of SQM Research, Louis Christopher, says buyers need to ask what would trigger a major selloff in housing and assess the likelihood of those events happening. One strong trigger (thanks to high levels of household debt) would be a return of rising interest rates. ”All it took was the cash rate to get to 4.75 per cent to cause problems in this country,” he says.
He says buyers also need to watch for signs of the banks reducing loan-to-valuation ratios. He says house prices in most big British cities fell by about 20 per cent when British lenders suddenly cut lending ratios from 100 per cent or more to 80 per cent.
”Think about it,” he says. ”If you had a $50,000 deposit and someone was willing to lend 95 per cent, you could borrow up to $950,000. But if they would only lend 80 per cent, you could borrow $200,000 and your maximum purchasing power would be cut from $1 million to $250,000. You can see the havoc that would cause in the market.”
Why would banks cut their loan ratios? Like most things, it comes back to Europe. At worst, if Europe unravelled, we would be likely to see significant bank defaults that would limit the ability of other banks to raise finance outside their own countries. Australian banks have already raised the threat of another credit squeeze.
Other risks include unemployment rising to levels in which forced sales become a problem (Christopher says SQM Research’s modelling suggests problems would occur if unemployment broke through 7 per cent) and banks lifting interest rates independently of the Reserve Bank’s changes.
Oliver says the most vulnerable are heavily geared buyers, because they are most exposed to negative equity and forced sales. RP Data recently found slightly less than 5 per cent of Australian houses were worth less than their purchase price. Queensland had the highest levels of negative equity while Victorian households had the strongest equity positions. In Melbourne, 1.9 per cent of houses were worth less than their purchase price. However, the figures did not take into account debt, especially mortgage redraws.
The research director at RP Data, Tim Lawless, says coastal lifestyle markets are also vulnerable to a downturn and have already suffered from a downturn in tourism and sea-change migrants, as well as weak demand from second-home buyers. He says many of these lifestyle markets experienced dramatic appreciation before the GFC.
He says markets that had a big run-up in prices during the most recent growth periods are now also potentially more exposed to weaker conditions. ”The Melbourne market, for example, has seen home values appreciate by almost 50 per cent since the start of 2007,” he says. ”Rental yields in Melbourne are now the lowest of any capital city and new housing supply has been much more sufficient than [in] other cities.”
WHERE THE OPPORTUNITIES ARE
In this market, most analysts say the old strategies no longer guarantee success.
Buyers will need to do their sums and ensure they are buying well rather than simply picking the next ”hot suburbs” and riding the boom.
Success will also depend on having the flexibility to decide when to sell. That means buyers will need to keep borrowings at a manageable level so they are not forced to sell at the worst possible time.
Christopher says he is loath to tip particular areas, given that any recovery might not be long-lived. But he does favour the outer ring of Sydney, particularly the western and south-western suburbs.
”We see a big movement to more affordable housing,” he says. ”Rents there have already been rising by about 5 per cent a year, infrastructure has been improving and they have the potential to outperform over the next five years. We think 7 per cent growth there is possible.
”More average and above-average income earners are moving west because they don’t want to raise a family in a unit and it makes the mortgage more manageable.”
APM forecasts growth in Sydney this year will come mostly from middle- and lower-band suburbs, supported by high rents and an undersupply of housing. In his 2012 outlook, the senior research analyst at RP Data, Cameron Kusher, also predicted Sydney might perform better than in 2011. ”Home values across Sydney have increased at an average annual rate of just 4 per cent over the past 10 years,” he says. ”Although value growth has been limited, rents have increased by 5.4 per cent for houses and by 6.4 per cent for units in 2011. Estimated sales activity as at September 2011 was 6 per cent above the five-year average. Sydney’s market continues to be hampered by an undersupply of new housing at a time when demand remains strong.
”Although we don’t expect property values to increase at a rate above inflation, we anticipate Sydney will continue to be one of the better-performed markets, especially considering that when adjusted for inflation, values remain below their 2004 peaks.”
A property adviser at Lachlan Partners, Ana Bennett, says areas along the main Sydney transport corridors ”should do well”, given the undersupply of housing – ”areas that aren’t reliant on having two cars to get to work” – though she says Melbourne is a different prospect.
”The large volume of stock coming onto the market in Melbourne is a concern,” she says.
For investment, she favours ”the groovy, funky areas with a younger demographic”, such as South Yarra, Richmond and Middle Park.
”The other opportunity is the old house on the corner block in suburbs like Cheltenham where there is the potential for multi-residences down the track,” she says. ”Investors can rent them out for five years or so with a view to either selling the site or developing themselves. People are saying they’ll build one residence for themselves and sell the second for profit.”
Braddick says buyers should be aware that states are likely to perform differently. ”NSW has the advantage of being the most undersupplied market but it’s tricky to look at particular sectors.” He says if the construction and resources sectors continue to boom, this could support the upper end of the market, while soft conditions in retail and manufacturing could dampen the middle and lower parts of the market.
”But ultimately it will come back to the ‘atmospherics’ – the number of properties on the market, current sentiment and so on,” he says. ”Over the short term there could be significant increases or falls but on average the market is unlikely to achieve much.”
A GREATER FOCUS ON YIELD
To a large extent, buying a home is a lifestyle decision and you can afford to trade off slower capital growth against the desire for a place to call your own.
But if you’re considering putting your hard-earned money to work in investment property, you’ll need to be hard-headed.
Braddick says investors in the 2000s ”got away with non-focused property buying because most prices were going up.” But with capital gains likely to play less of a role, investors will need to focus on yield for more of their return.
”You need to look at the yields now and what they will be in the future,” Bennett says. ”The initial yields in the inner city may be lower but newer stock can balance that with depreciation allowances and if you get income growth, the yield will bounce back.”
Lawless says units have outperformed detached dwellings in terms of value growth in recent years.
”This is probably due to both improving demand related to price sensitivity [units are generally more affordable than houses] as well as the fact that units generally provide higher rental yields than houses. With more focus on urban renewal and higher densities around transport hubs and employment nodes, we would expect that well-located units will continue to be a popular choice for investors,” he says.
”Another tactic that is likely to remain popular among investors is buying within close proximity to the capital cities. The 10-kilometre to 15-kilometre ring should continue to provide reasonable housing demand with tight supply constraints. Public and private transport options are becoming even more important and these factors will be one of the primary drivers of long-term capital gain.”
Oliver says investors might also want to consider looking outside the residential box.
”You can argue that if you’re going to buy investment property, you’d be better off looking at commercial property where the yields are higher and there is less evidence of overvaluation,” he says. ”Listed property trusts have gone back to their roots after going through a more speculative period and are offering yields of 5.5 per cent to 6 per cent, unlisted property trusts and syndicates are an option [though you have to be careful], or you can invest directly in something like a shop, warehouse or strata office.”
The new rules to property success
When it comes to gearing, less is more. ”It’s not what you own but what you owe,” Shane Oliver, of AMP Capital Investors, says.
Think affordability. The more expensive your property, the smaller the list of potential buyers or renters.
Buy well. What’s the point of being in a weak market if you don’t get to dictate terms? ”You make money in property when you buy, not when you sell,” Ana Bennett, of Lachlan Partners, says.
Don’t count on making a quick buck. ”If you think you’re getting a bargain, you’re usually not,” Bennett says. She says property should be regarded as a long-term investment. ”Particularly for investors, you have to ask whether you can really afford it,” she says. ”There’s no point struggling and realising you have to sell in two to three years.”
If you’re investing, think income. In the absence of strong capital growth, investment returns will increasingly depend on a decent, and growing, rental yield.
Do your homework. While average returns might not look promising, the property market is highly segmented and demand for the right properties will remain strong. Look for properties that are in undersupply, not a dime a dozen. ”I would be wary of locations that have recently experienced a large surge in home values or where rental yields are lower than average,” RP Data’s Tim Lawless says. ”Areas where housing can easily become oversupplied should also be treated with some caution.”
Understand that property prices can be volatile – especially in the short term. Just because your house price isn’t quoted on the news each night doesn’t mean it can’t go up and down. ”If you put a large proportion of your money into a particular investment, it is a risky position, particularly if you’re also leveraged,” Michael Sherris, from the Australian School of Business, says. ”There may be half the volatility that you get with shares but people think there’s no volatility at all.”
Look for areas with strong population growth, strong demand and good infrastructure that is improving.
Think outside the box. Will it be possible to add value to the property in the future? If residential property doesn’t stack up, what about commercial?
Don’t expect history to repeat itself.
Story by Annette Sampson, source: www.domain.com.au
Filed under News, Real Estate by Lois Buckett on February 13, 2012 at 7:51 am
no comments
Filed under Lennox Head, News by Lois Buckett on February 1, 2012 at 10:09 am
no comments

The preliminary capital city dwelling value index result for December was -0.2% (s.a.) following an upwardly revised +0.4% rise in dwelling values in November (was +0.1%). Revised regional house values for November increased from +0.3% to +0.5%. Sydney housing has been the nation’s best performer with dwelling values up 0.4% in December and by 0.7% over the quarter (s.a.).
In the generally seasonally weak month of December, the preliminary RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index result for capital city dwelling values was -0.2 per cent (s.a.). Low sales volumes in December mean that this number will likely see a more significant revision than normal.
The November result from the RP Data-Rismark index for dwellings in capital cities has revised up from +0.1 per cent (s.a.) to +0.4 per cent (s.a.) based on additional sales information. This marks the largest month-on-month improvement in Australian home values since May 2010.
The RP Data-Rismark ‘rest-of-state’ index, which covers Australia’s regional markets, has also revised up in November from +0.3 per cent to +0.5 per cent (s.a.). This is the most significant increase in regional house values since November 2010.
Over the December quarter, Australia’s capital city home values declined by -0.5 per cent (s.a.).
RP Data’s director of research Tim Lawless, said, “The December quarter was the year’s smallest quarterly decline. According to our index, capital city home values fell by -1.5 per cent (s.a.) in the March quarter, and by a further -0.8 per cent (s.a.) in each of the June and September quarters. This rate of decline had decelerated to -0.5% by the final quarter of 2011.”
In 2011, Australian capital city dwelling values experienced a capital loss of about three and a half per cent. Regional house values fared a little better, correcting by around three per cent. This compared to the 14-15 per cent decline in Australian shares. Adding in rents, the gross total return to Australian property investors was slightly less than one per cent over 2011.
Rismark’s managing director Ben Skilbeck said, “The month of December is characterised by a significant lull in activity and the preliminary index results have likely been influenced by some more volatile Melbourne and Perth estimates. We expect to get better clarity on the monthly movements as more information is reported.”
“Sydney currently has the largest volume of reported sales in December. In seasonally-adjusted terms, Sydney dwelling values rose by 0.4 per cent in the month of December. In the December quarter, Sydney dwelling values are up a total of 0.7 per cent (s.a.)” Mr Skilbeck said.
RP Data’s Tim Lawless observed that rental markets continued to strengthen in December.
“Weekly rents across the capital cities were up 1.0 per cent over the December quarter and are now 6.3 per cent higher than at the same time last year.”
“These higher rental rates combined with the slide in property values have improved investors’ yields. The average capital city dwelling is now offering a gross rental return of 4.6 per cent after a consistent trend upwards since mid-2010 when the typical capital city dwelling was yielding just 4.1 per cent. Darwin and Canberra are the highest yielding locations for property investors while Hobart, Brisbane, and Sydney provide gross yields that are better than average,” Mr Lawless said.
On the outlook for the year ahead, Rismark’s Ben Skilbeck commented, “We expect that the RBA’s interest rate cuts in the final two months of 2011 will lend further momentum to housing activity as transaction volumes pick up over February and March after the seasonally slow months of December and January. If financial market pricing for substantial additional RBA rate cuts proves accurate, we could see a stronger-than-expected bounce-back in housing conditions.”
“Housing affordability in Australia has experienced a striking improvement in recent times. While disposable household incomes on a per household basis rose by five per cent over the year to September 2011, Australian dwelling values have declined by 3.4 per cent since September 2010. As a result of the RBA’s rate cuts borrowers can now get fixed- and variable-rate home loans as low as 5.9 per cent and 6.14 per cent. Rismark’s research shows that disposable incomes per household have risen about 15 per cent further than Australian dwelling values since the end of 2003. This helps account for the decline in Rismark’s national dwelling price-to-income ratio, which is as low as its been since 2003” Mr Skilbeck said.
RP Data’s Tim Lawless added, “While global uncertainty and a stagnant local labour market could weigh on the consumer’s mindset, we are nevertheless observing improvements in monthly housing finance commitments. RP Data’s leading indicators on average selling times and vendor discounts are also starting to look healthier. There is no doubt that additional interest rate relief in 2012 would afford a very welcome cushion to the housing market.”
Filed under News, Real Estate by Lois Buckett on January 13, 2012 at 6:11 pm
no comments
New home sales jumped in November in response to the Reserve Bank’s interest rate cut.
The sales of new homes rose 6.8 per cent in November, following a downwardly revised increase of 2.8 per cent in October, according to the Housing Industry Association – Jeld Wen new home sales report.
While detached house sales surged 9.8 per cent, apartment sales slumped 17 per cent, HIA said today.
“Interest rate cuts, both those we’ve had and those that are still warranted, provide a … catalyst for a sustained and strong recovery in new home building conditions,” said HIA chief economist Harley Dale.
The Reserve Bank in November lowered the interest rate to 4.5 per cent from 4.75 per cent, in response to increased concerns about the European sovereign debt crisis slowing the global economy and hurting Australia’s growth.
It was the first reduction since April 2009. In December the RBA cut the key rate by another 25 basis points.
Capital city home values also posted their first monthly rise in 2011 in November, edging up 0.1 per cent seasonally adjusted, according to RPData.com.
For the year to November, however, capital city home prices fell 3.5 per cent.
"This is a healthier but not unexpected result," Dr Dale said.
"With falling interest rates, a competitive building market, and a greater availability of skilled trades amidst still very soft overall demand conditions, now is clearly a good time to build a new home for those who are financially set to take that decision.
“There is, however, a long way to go to restore new home sales volumes to acceptable levels," he said. "At present sales volumes are running at least 20 per cent below what you could conservatively call
healthy."
Sales soar in NSW
The volume of detached house sales soared 22.8 per cent in New South Wales and 11.6 per cent in Victoria. They also rose 5.7 per cent in Western Australia and 4.7 per cent in Queensland. In South Australia they fell 11.3 per cent.
Mr Dale said a full recovery in housing activity wouldn’t emerge unless the government offered well-targeted stimulus and began to reform housing planning policy to cut the barriers to new housing supply.
Measures of growth in the construction sector show that it remains under pressure, as households borrow less and real estate prices keep housing out of reach for would-be buyers.
The Australian performance of construction index for December, released today, remained under the 50 point level separating expansion from contraction for the 19th straight month even as the index rose by 1.4 points to 41 in December, helped by the resources-related construction.
Australian Industry Group director of public policy Peter Burn said the two-speed economy was visible in construction data, with "a clear divide between the expanding engineering construction sub-sector and the still-contracting commercial and residential construction sub-sectors".
House building fell 5.7 points in December to minus-32.9.
"The increased pace of contraction in the house building sub-sector in December remains deeply concerning," Mr Burn said.
Story by Chris Zappone www.domain.com.au
Filed under News, Research by Lois Buckett on January 13, 2012 at 5:58 pm
no comments
We’ve been so worried about plastic shopping bags, but what about the plastic we use to wrap our lunches?
As a Mum there are some things I am not imaginative enough to work out. What do you suggest as substitutes for freezer wrap to put meat or cakes etc in, and for lunch?
Like their shopping bag counterparts, plastic products such as freezer bags and cling film are not environment-friendly.
While technically it’s possible to recycle plastic bags, the reality is not simple.
Linda Edwards from the National Packaging Covenant explains: “No Australian plastic is biodegradable. Traditionally in Australia it’s been very difficult to recycle because of the sorting and collection system needed. Also there is a lack of plants able to reprocess it.”
Fortunately, there are alternative, environment-friendly options.
Substitutes such as 4MyEarth Wraps (www.4myearth.com.au) are a good choice for keeping sandwiches fresh. These reusable wraps are machine washable, and they not only wrap sandwiches but also act as a placemat to eat them off! The wraps come in sandwich and snack sizes.
A sandwich-sized hard plastic container would also do the trick.
When storing food in your fridge or freezer, consider investing in plastic containers rather than plastic bags – containers are endlessly reusable so you don’t need to discard the plastic every time you take something out of the freezer.
Multiple use freezer bags can be found in your local supermarket, although these have to be thrown out eventually.
Look out for biodegradable freezer bags that have recently come onto the market. They’re made of cornstarch, a renewable resource.
But if you can’t give up the cling wrap, remember that you probably don’t need to use very much – it only needs to cover the food, not mummy-wrap it!
Story source: www.yonderr.com.au
Filed under Lennox Head, News by Lois Buckett on January 9, 2012 at 10:25 am
no comments

AUSTRALIAN housing markets displayed a generally resilient performance in 2011, reflecting the inherent security of residential real estate in this country, particularly when compared with housing markets in similar open-market economies.
The year was always set to be a period of correction for Australia’s housing markets following the unsustainable growth in house prices recorded through 2009 and 2010.
Between January 2009 and June 2010, Melbourne’s quarterly median house price rose by nearly 30 per cent, with Sydney’s up by almost 20 per cent over the same period. All other capitals also recorded big rises in house prices over those 18 months.
Housing affordability crashed by the end of 2010, with surging house prices and rising interest rates combining to send buyers into hibernation.
Australian Property Monitors data has revealed that capital city housing markets have generally performed encouragingly in 2011 despite the pressure on housing affordability generated in 2010 and a mixed economic performance in 2011.
The national median price for houses over the year to October 2011 fell by just 1 per cent compared with the previous year, with median unit prices rising by 1.2 per cent over the year. The 2011 result follows a 17 per cent rise in the national median house price over the year to October 2010 and a 12.2 per cent rise in the median unit price over the same period.
The best capital city performers were Melbourne and Sydney, where annual median house prices rose by 1 per cent. Darwin and Adelaide house prices were flat and Hobart down 1.5 per cent.
The worst performers over the year were Brisbane and Perth, where annual median house prices fell by 3.5 and 4.75 per cent respectively.
The unit market clearly outperformed the housing market over the year to October 2011, with Sydney recording median unit price growth of 2 per cent followed by Melbourne and Darwin up by 1 per cent. Brisbane and Perth were again the underperformers, with annual unit prices falling by 1.3 per cent and 3.5 per cent respectively.
Bureau of Statistics data confirms the solid performance by Australian housing markets in 2011, with the number of owner-occupier housing loans rising by 2.4 per cent over the 10 months ending October compared with the same period in 2010.
New South Wales was the best performer with an increase of 8 per cent, with Western Australia surprisingly in second place with growth in home loans of 7 per cent over the year, courtesy of a surge in the past three months – indicating perhaps growing late-year momentum in that market.
By contrast, the number of home loans approved in Queensland in the year to October fell by 8.4 per cent compared with the same period in 2010.
The nature and strength of Australian housing markets in 2011 was always to be determined by the underlying supply and demand characteristics of individual markets and the strength of national and local economies.
In addition to the affordability barriers created by the prices surge and interest rate rises of 2009 and 2010, housing markets have had to encounter unexpected headwinds in 2011. The impact of the central Queensland and Brisbane floods was not restricted to the local housing markets. National economic output was affected through reduced coal exports and the cost of the reconstruction levy. Higher prices for fruit and vegetables also affected household budgets nationally.
The impact of catastrophic natural disasters on the national psyche and confidence cannot be underestimated, particularly given Australia’s recent propensity for financial conservatism, especially when it comes to buying or borrowing.
The Japanese earthquake and associated tsunami in March also contributed to lower economic growth and reduced consumer confidence.
Stalling economic growth in 2011 was also a product of continued mixed performances by various industry sectors, particularly retail, manufacturing, tourism and construction. As a consequence, all capitals recorded rises in unemployment through mid-year. All these factors combined to subdue consumer capacity and confidence and consequently dampen home buying activity through 2011.
Most Australian capital city housing markets are, however, set to record growth in median prices over 2012 as the national economy gathers strength. The Australian economy is primed to expand strongly on the back of a significant resources boom with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development predicting gross domestic product will increase by 4 per cent over the year.
Melbourne, Adelaide and Hobart will be the underperformers in 2012, with median house price growth of between zero and 5 per cent.
Melbourne’s balanced housing supply and demand mix offers buyers a wide choice and it remains the most tenant-friendly capital city rental market. Affordability barriers, however, remain for home buyers.
With the Victorian economy showing signs of running out of puff, particularly as the recent construction boom abates, the housing market is set to drift sideways though 2012. The possibility remains of some growth in median house prices by the end of 2012 as the impact of a strong national economy filters through.
Dr Andrew Wilson is senior economist for Australian Property Monitors.
Source: BusinessDay
www.news.domain.com.au
Filed under News, Real Estate by Lois Buckett on January 6, 2012 at 3:31 pm
no comments

If you’re a parent, you likely have several giant bins filled to the brim with toys for your little ones. And with Christmas (ho ho ho!) over you’re likely to have gotten toys in all shapes and sizes. And while I’m no bah humbug, the relative size of our children’s toy boxes has become incredibly large given their small stature, and the environmental problems are equally ill-proportioned:
- Mountains of trash: Of the 40 million toys thrown away annually, 13 million are put into the rubbish according to green living website www.ecolife.com.
- Difficult recycling: Because toys are made from many different materials – plastics, metal, glass, computer components, and more – they are incredibly difficult to recycle and in many cases are not accepted by recycling facilities.
Once Christmas is over, we try to keep the toys under control (as well as our carbon footprint) by having a post-Christmas clean-up and getting rid of toys that haven’t been used or the children have simply grown out of.
Donating used toys to a good cause can be one of the most effective ways to recycle toys. Not only does this prevent garbage from being sent to landfills, it provides a second life for your used toys, which means the materials will go on functioning for many months or years to come. The sky’s the limit when it comes to donating used toys – use your imagination to find a person or charity who could use your second hand toys:
- Children’s charities
- Children’s hospitals
- Churches
- Day cares
- Family members
- Friends
- Neighbours
- Playgroups
- Thrift shops like those through St Vincent de Paul or the Salvation Army
Not all toys can be donated to charities for various health and ethical reasons. To ensure that your toys have the best chance of being given away rather than trashed, consider these toy donation guidelines:
- Toys should be nontoxic
- Ensure that the toys are clean and are not missing parts
- Broken toys are unlikely to be accepted, especially if they pose a choking hazard
- Avoid toys with a religious theme unless you’re donating to a faith-based charity
- Toys that require batteries are not as suitable for donation as they will require the parents of the child to purchase batteries (which may be out of their budget)
- Toys made from things like fabric, cardboard, paper, and other absorbable materials are often rejected as they are difficult to clean and disinfect
In addition to donating used toys, there are many ways you can recycle toys so that they don’t end up in the landfill:
- Contribute to a toy library: Some communities have toy libraries that are like book libraries – you can check toys in and out so that your child is never bored with their personal stash. Each toy library is unique to the local community, so the best way to find one in your area is to do a search online for your city/town name + “toy library.”
- Sell or trade: Sometimes a toy is too valuable to simply give away, in which case you could try to sell it.
- Recycling centers: Some communities have set up recycling programs for large plastic toys and metals toys as well, though you will need to call ahead to determine your recycling centre’s toy recycling policy.
- Deconstruction: If your recycling centre will not take your toys as is, sometimes you can dismantle them yourself to recycle the various components, such as the paper, cardboard, metal, and plastic which can then be put with other recyclables of the same kind. Cardboard and paper components can also be composted.
If you have any good ideas for what can be done with second hand toys we’d love to hear from you.
Source: www.ecolife.com
Read more on how to be green at www.yonderr.com.au
Filed under Lennox Head, News by Lois Buckett on December 19, 2011 at 2:41 pm
no comments
While swimming is a great form of exercise, the downside is that pools require vast amounts of water. Just to fill the average backyard pool takes 50,000 litres – and that’s roughly one third of the water used by an average person in a year.
Even more water is needed for regular top-ups. All up, a home with a pool uses 10 per cent more water than a home without a pool.
But surprisingly, water isn’t the only conservation concern – swimming pools are energy intensive too. According to the NSW Government, running a pool pump will increase your household energy use (and your carbon footprint) by 17 per cent and that’s not including energy needed for pool heating.
So does this mean we should fill in our swimming pools? Has the backyard pool become an extravagant luxury this planet can no longer afford? While we can argue back and forth on the pros and cons of a swimming pool there are a number of ways to cut down on pool energy and water use.
Slash water wastage
An uncovered pool can lose up to one-and-a-half times its total volume in one year through evaporation. In Sydney and Brisbane, rainfall can come close to replacing half the evaporation, assuming that it falls at the right time and in the right amounts so the pool doesn’t overflow. Yet in a dry city like Perth, rain compensates for only 10 per cent of the water lost.
There is one really simple way to save water – invest in a pool cover and reduce evaporation by up to 97 percent. For an outlay of $500 – $1,500 you can purchase a cover that will also prevent heat loss at night, thereby extending the swimming season and saving on heating costs.
As an added bonus, covers also keep leaves and dirt out of the pool and reduce the evaporation of the chemicals used to keep the pool clean.
The type of filter you use can also make a big difference to water efficiency. Sand filters can waste up to 15,000 litres of water each year because they require backwashing to clean the filter. Cartridge filters, on the other hand, can be cleaned with a quick rinse from the hose, saving water and reducing the amount of pool chemicals dumped into the sewer.
Finally, make sure you have no leaks – one drip per second adds up to 7,000 wasted litres a year.
Top up with rainwater
No matter how vigilant you are at preventing water loss, the pool will need an occasional top-up. A simple idea is to attach an inexpensive rainwater diverter to a downpipe to direct water into your pool. Some models on the market can also prevent the first flush of leaves entering your pool.
Just bear in mind that during a large downpour you may need to divert the flow back to the stormwater to ensure the pool doesn’t overflow. A better but more expensive solution is to install a rainwater tank so you can store water for when you need it.
Create a zero-emission pool
It’s an expensive exercise to operate your pool pump continuously – just running it for eight hours a day will cost about $650 per year and emit four tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.
The solution is to purchase a solar pump that will cost nothing to run.
Many pool owners like to extend the swimming season by heating their pool – but how do you avoid puffing more greenhouse gases into the air? The answer is to go solar.
If your roof is unsuitable, a heat pump is another greenhouse friendly option. Heat pumps work by absorbing heat from the air and transferring it to stored water – a bit like a reverse refrigerator. While they use electricity, the amount required is tiny. Traditionally used for household hot water they are now available to heat swimming pools. Since warm water evaporates faster than cold water it’s even more important to cover a heated pool – it will also reduce heat loss.
Also crucial for optimum operation is an easy-to-install solar controller that monitors and regulates water temperature.
Cut down on chemicals
Pools use rather a lot of nasty chemicals – of which chlorine is the most significant. The concentrated liquid form of chlorine, sodium hypochlorite (or bleach), is extremely corrosive and regarded as highly toxic by the US EPA. For these reasons it should be securely stored and kept out of reach of children. It is acutely toxic to aquatic organisms, which is another reason to avoid sand filters, which create high volumes of chlorinated backwash.
The need for chlorine can be minimised through your choice of water treatment system. UV and ozone systems cut down the amount of chlorine needed by 70 to 80 per cent, and ionisers also reduce the need for chlorine.
Salt chlorinators have the advantage that you don’t need to handle chlorine although you’ll still end up with sodium hypochlorite in the pool solution.
You can also reduce chlorine use by keeping your pool clean and preventing its evaporation with a pool cover. Avoid locating plants that drop their leaves close to the pool and ensure filters are cleaned regularly. To avoid chemicals altogether consider a natural swimming pool.
The upshot?
Pools may be an unparalleled summer luxury – let’s face it, there’s nothing quite like a midnight dip on a hot summer night – but they are certainly not the eco-friendliest addition you can make to your backyard.
If you are going to have a pool, there are ways to make yours the greenest in the neighbourhood. With rainwater and solar power, you can reduce your pool’s impact to near zero.
Of course, for those of us lucky enough to live near the sea, a river, lake or mountain stream, nature provides the greenest swimming pool of all.
Read more here.
Story source: www.yonderr.com.au
Filed under Finance, First Home Buyers by Lois Buckett on December 12, 2011 at 5:31 pm
no comments
Home loans by value fell in October and remained flat over the year, suggesting the housing sector remains stagnant.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) said on Monday that total housing finance by value fell 2.5 per cent in October, seasonally adjusted, to $20.458 billion.
The ABS data also showed that the value of home loans was largely unchanged from October 2010, when it was reported at $20.593 billion.
The number of home loans approved in October 2011 rose 0.7 per cent.
National Australia Bank chief economist Robert Henderson said Monday’s data showed the housing market was still deteriorating.
Mr Henderson said it was a fairly dismal report on the housing market, with falling lending in value terms and construction and investment lending both weak.
Recent data, including the national accounts figures released last week, have highlighted the weakness of the housing sector.
"It is clear that over the foreseeable future Australia will fall well short of building the number of new homes required for both owner-occupiers and renters," Housing Industry Association chief economist Harley Dale said.
"Amidst the growing risks to our economy from the situation in Europe, now is the time to be providing stimulus to the new home building sector while at the same time reinvigorating the housing supply reform process, which currently lies dormant."
Commonwealth Bank of Australia senior economist Michael Workman said Monday’s ABS figures were a little softer than he expected.
"If you go back and look at the data over the last 15 years or so, housing credit growth still remains exceptionally weak.
"So, for the housing market, it’s strongly biased towards the buyers rather than sellers and it looks like it’s going to stay that way."
Mr Workman said the Australian dollar and local bond futures were largely unaffected by the data.
RBC Capital Markets fixed income and currency strategist Michael Turner said the October housing figures were a little dated.
"China has already reported trade data for November, and the finance data do not reflect the November and December (monetary) policy easing (in Australia)," he said.
"As such, there are limited implications for markets.
"We expect more timely domestic data to better reflect the softening in global growth in coming months, which should justify further easing (of interest rates) and a move to accommodative territory in 2012."
ICAP senior economist Adam Carr said the housing data showed the Australian lending market was recovering even before the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) cut interest rates.
The cash rate is now at 4.25 per cent after two consecutive 25-basis point cuts in November and December.
"The 50-basis points worth of cuts we’ve seen will likely see lending growth accelerate over coming months, which will start to add to the strong private demand numbers we’ve seen to date," Mr Carr said.
Story source: www.ninemsn.com.au
Page 1 of 2012345»1020...Last »
Recent Comments